requestId:684c3e51d83ee6.37502524.
The dilemma of civilization theory in the “widely extensive history” structure
Author: Chen Yun
Source: “Huadong Master Fan Daxue” (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 2021 Issue 3
Abstract: The best efforts to build a “widely extensive history” through thinking and thinking. As a thinking plan and thinking experience, it is based on the thinking structure of Christian saving history and world-class theory, and with its broadness, it should be an uncommon experience in the preservation of history. But it does not prevent the following problems: the breakdown between the historical target and the historical subject makes history itself deprive the preservation of the specific individual; the preservation in history is originally involved, but in the broad historical conception, the specific individual becomes the viewer; The inconstant touch infection in the history of history is equal to the meaning of implicit human beings. Historical meaning is therefore conceived as a planting of historical goals that are beyond the sex. Therefore, the preservation of history is suppressed by the Internet as a station that fights against history itself and moves towards the end of sex. What hides in modern Eastern broad historical conception happens to be a non-historical idea of escape from history, which means the inner crisis of the wide-ranging historical planning of a practical thinking.
Keywords: broad history; Hegel; meaning; energy
wide history means such a thinking plan, that is, to fight against the decline of time-history through the establishment of broad nature in history Decay, then responds to the historical meaning anxiety that arises from the cold sacrifice of world history to the personal, ethnic group and civilization. The latter contains the intellectual nature of history and the morality of history: When the greatness and despicable disappear into the historical river, what is the meaning of historic preservation? Under the framework of systemic absolute philosophy, Hegel and others regarded secular history as the “income” of energy with the help of Christ’s resurrection symbols. The decline and resurgence of individuals and the common people is the “training” of energy. After the sacrifice of natural life, they gain energy regeneration and advance to a new stage in a veracity method. This is the meaning of the world’s decline, replacement, rise and fall, and other worldly suffocation in history. [1] As for the overall goal of energy confirmation of sports, it is combined with Ji Shi’s speculation, and the Eastern modern historical philosophy represented by Hegel leads to the end of history through the concept of history. Although Hegel’s history ends still open, that is, the process of history in time does not end, it actually includes a history that can ultimately perfect the real goal or perhaps the concept of finality, and this end structure becomes a historical necessity that cannot be reversed, and it gives the historical process a single line. God or “God will” guarantees this process and the purpose of the label. “All human society participates in the development of Ryugos in time, and representative history can be expanded from the sacred history of Joseph-Christianity. This is the work done by Hegel” [2]. People must live in the history of the world. But the specific people are actuallyThe purpose of changing history is to ultimately realize the energy and toward the self-fulfilment of history. Therefore, world history seems to have a purposeful force that overpowers people, which absorbs people and makes self-verification in it.
The separation of a historical goal and a historical subject
In the field of civilization theory, it is difficult to see that if there was no Joseph-Christian conception, it would be difficult to imagine such a final completion concept, despite Hegel’s reforms, and to shift the goal to a special position—both living within the world and outside history. In this way, the goal of world history is a target that transcends human ideas, but it is also the end point of completing history. The subjective logic of historical philosophy is no longer causal, but based on objectivity. As Herbert Schnädelbach pointed out, Kant and Hegel’s origins are that historical data do not provide sufficient foundation for the systematic system of their history. To answer the continuous correlation of historical events, one can only rely on a philosophical basic theories; those behaviors that can be systematically touched by historical events do not occur purely out of nature, so the causal systemization of history is insufficient. Similarly, the goal system that suits the key points such as “intention”, “plan”, and “goal” is not complete, because historical behavior does not have any cooperation goals determined by the human being. “The remaining unique future is as long as the system of object-based discussion, that is, the connection between the final goal is to explain the relationship between the matter. This ultimate goal is the most fundamental of the matter, and it also determines that the matter is objective and has nothing to do with the human subjective concept. The oldest model of this system is as the history of salvation (Heilsges). Chichte’s world history model, based on such historical views, all historical events must ultimately serve a goal determined by the will of all abilities and benevolence. “[3] Kant regarded this goal as understanding the scheming principles of history, from the incompetent or lacking confidence hypothesis of three-body, but Hegel regarded it as the constitutive principle of world history. With the goal structure of historical thinking, historical thinking can be developed on the foundation of philosophy, which is different from the assessment of empirical science. Scientific assessments are limited to the domain of phenomena, that is, to the relationship between determined objects that constitute the world phenomenon, and this is a domain that applies causal interpretation, but cannot obtain the meaning of world history within this architecture or domain; while philosophical assessments point to the relationship between decisive thinking and determined objects, that is, it evaluates the relationship between people as subjects and the world. The interpretation of goal statements can be involved in accordance with the law, because the latter is suitable for the relationship between subjects and objects. 【4】The understanding of the goal statement may be able to explain historical events and causes, but it cannot explain specific historical events, becauseFor planning and goals, the business is always extraneous and occasionally; although the interpretation of goal theory cannot be introduced from experience and cannot be proven by experience, it can constitute the concept of historical overall. Before Christianity introduced into Eastern civilization, even though the Greeks had emotional concepts, the whole history did not become capable. It was precisely the perspective of the Catholic view beyond the history introduced by Christianity that allowed history as the whole to be capable of.
For the infinite historic preservation subject, history as a whole is almost impossible. It does not preserve it with the historical whole, and it has such a relationship with the historical whole, that is, the historical whole is always outside the preservation of the infinite personal; on the contrary, when the speculative sensibility of the historical whole present in Hegel can be constructed, it cannot rob the alienity of the infinite personal. As Nietzsche said, “To date, all the writings of history have settled in the results, and assumed to be sentimental in this result. Even Greek history is the same. But they are not part of us. [5] The object of Hegel’s historical philosophy is not the infinite preserved in history. It is a sensual subject that transcends infinity and realizes a more capable and capable in history in history in some way. This subject reaches the existence of “inactive activity” and “demandless demand”. [6] In this regard, although Hegel will be the Christian world theory Turning to the completion of the world’s energy, however, it is not the spirit guide in the heart of the Christian tradition, but a philosopher cultivated by Greek philosophical tradition. The subject of Hegelian historical philosophy points to the ability of the “person who lives in the ‘ideology’ ”, this energy was invented by ancient Greek tradition, which provided the energy to a “person who is in theory”. [7]
In Metaphysics (1025b-1027b), Aristotle once lived in the area There are three types of knowledge: theoretike, which is the goal of the goal, theoretike, which is the goal of application, and the “creative knowledge, which is seeking for creation and manufacturing. The highest of these is the theoretical knowledge constructed by the thinking activity. As far as knowledge is concerned, it includes five levels: perception, memory, experience, technology, and cleverness. Psychology is the highest level. The knowledge of theoretical knowledge or thinking is smart, and the object of thinking is unchanging and certain. The nature of things or things is unmovable and its purpose is in its own activities. [8] The subject of speculative knowledge looks at ideas with the eyes of “Nus” and dedicates all life to pure thinking, which is regarded as the most wonderful and most expensive way of existence. Because this method is only for The pursuit of knowledge and learning from t
發佈留言